Why Choose M AI Solutions Over Other AI Agencies
Choosing the right AI partner is critical. Here's why forward-thinking companies choose M AI Solutions: production-grade systems, honest process, real outcomes, and genuine partnership. No black box. No surprises.
Client Retention
95%
Agents Deployed
50+
Team Size
15+
Success Rate
94%
Differentiation & Positioning
We specialize in agentic systems + voice agents; we charge by outcome not hours; we stay embedded post-launch (Scale partnerships).
Other Agencies:
- "We'll build anything" → generalists (weaker on agentic AI)
- Charge by hours → incentivized to slow down
- Fire-and-forget → project ends at delivery
- Vague timelines → "5–8 weeks" (usually longer)
- Black box → you don't see what's happening
M AI:
- Specialists in agentic AI + voice agents (not generalists)
- Charge by pilot + outcome → incentivized to ship fast
- Stay embedded (Scale partnership) → we own success
- Transparent timeline → "10–14 days or we iterate"
- White box → you see logs, decisions, ROI
Real Example: Agency A: "We'll build your sales agent. ₹20L. 3 months." M AI: "We'll ship your sales agent pilot. ₹12L. 14 days. If ROI looks good → Scale partnership."
OpenAI/Anthropic build models; we build complete systems (models + guardrails + integrations + monitoring + support + outcomes).
OpenAI Assistants: You get playground to test prompts + API access. You miss: Production infrastructure, monitoring, integrations, 24/7 support.
Anthropic MCP/Tools: You get tool protocol specification. You miss: Implementation, orchestration, monitoring, human-in-the-loop, guardrails.
M AI: You get production agent running live, integrations working, monitoring 24/7, guardrails active, human approvals for critical actions, team training, ongoing support.
Analogy: OpenAI/Anthropic = car engine manufacturer. You = someone wanting to drive. M AI = car manufacturer (complete car: engine + chassis + steering + brakes + support).
Real Example: A startup tries building with OpenAI Assistants → Week 1: "This is easy!" → Week 5: Still not production-ready. With M AI: Week 4: Live in production + monitoring.
Freelancers are fine for one-off projects; agents need ongoing expertise (model upgrades, reliability, optimization, scaling).
Freelancer Model: Low cost ($500–2K/month), but: Disappears when project ends, can't handle production issues (3 AM alert?), no agentic AI expertise, single point of failure.
M AI Model: Accountable (we're responsible for uptime), ongoing support (24/7 for Scale clients), agentic AI expertise, scaling expertise (50+ agents), model upgrades included.
Comparison:
- Upfront cost: Freelancer $500–1K vs. M AI $8–15K
- Availability: Weekdays (timezone TBD) vs. 24/7 for Scale clients
- Scaling to 10 agents: Need 10 freelancers vs. Same M AI team
- Risk: High (disappears) vs. Low (contractual)
When Freelancer Makes Sense: One-off custom code, simple integrations, you have internal AI expertise.
When M AI Makes Sense: Production agents that keep running, scaling beyond 1–2 agents, need someone responsible at 2 AM.
We're transparent (logs, approvals, audit trails), compliant (SOC2-ready, GDPR-ready), and accountable (SLA + guardrails).
Trust Builders:
1. Transparency: Every agent decision is logged, you see the logs, audit trail for compliance, monthly performance reports.
2. Guardrails: Critical actions require human approval, agents can't break things without permission, fallback strategies for errors.
3. Compliance: SOC2 Type II ready, GDPR compliant, HIPAA compatible, NITI Aayog AI principles.
4. Accountability: SLA commitments (in writing), if we miss SLA → credits/refund, if agent fails → we fix it (no cost during Scale).
5. Real Clients: 50+ agents in production, 95%+ client retention, case studies (ADW Finance, IL Faro).
Real Example: Delhi lending firm asks: "What if your agent approves a fraudulent loan?" Our answer: Every loan approval triggers Slack notification, amount > ₹50L → manager must manually approve, full audit trail if fraud detected.
Yes—we've had pilot failures (3 out of 50+ projects). Honest about what went wrong + how we fixed it.
Our Honest Track Record:
- Successes: 47 out of 50 pilots became Scale partnerships (94% success rate)
- Failures: 3 pilots didn't achieve ROI initially
Failure Case 1: E-commerce customer support chatbot couldn't handle edge cases. We fixed guardrails, retrained, re-piloted in 2 weeks → now a Scale client.
Failure Case 2: BFSI loan qualification had poor data quality. Agent learned to reject low-quality data, customer improved data → now successful.
Failure Case 3: Logistics startup pivoted markets mid-pilot. Stopped work professionally, no penalty, parted ways.
Lessons: Data quality matters, edge cases are real, pivots happen, iteration is normal.
Our Philosophy: We don't hide failures. We iterate + fix until it works. Any agency claiming 100% success is lying.
Process & Guarantees
No money-back guarantee on pilots (rare in B2B); Scale partnerships are month-to-month (cancel anytime). Iterate until satisfied or part ways professionally.
Pilot Phase Guarantee: Cost $8–15K. We deliver a working agent in production. What if it doesn't work? We iterate free (up to 2–3 cycles). What if still doesn't work? Honest conversation → options: pivot workflow, refund (rare), or pause.
Scale Partnership Guarantee: Cost $3–8K/month. Month-to-month (cancel anytime, 30-day notice). No long-term lock-in. If unhappy → cancel next month.
Why No Money-Back Guarantee? Pilots are customized (can't resell), success depends partly on your execution, instead we make refunds rare by iterating until you're happy.
Real Example: Client says: "The agent didn't convert as expected." We ask what's the issue, iterate (included, no extra charge), usually 1–2 weeks later → working well.
Our Real Guarantee: Your success = our success. If you're not winning, we fix it.
100% transparent: pilot timeline is 10–14 days (or we iterate free); costs are fixed upfront (no surprises).
Timeline Transparency:
- Day 1–2: Audit (you provide data, APIs, context)
- Day 3–7: Build (we ship working agent)
- Day 8–12: Test & iterate (you test live, we refine)
- Day 13–14: Deploy to production (go live)
- What if we miss 14 days? We iterate for free.
Cost Transparency:
- Simple agent (lead capture): $8K
- Medium agent (multi-step): $12K
- Complex agent (multi-agent, custom integrations): $15K
- Scale: $3–8K/month depending on complexity
What's Included (No Extra Charges): Monitoring 24/7, performance optimization, model upgrades, 1–2 new workflows/month, monthly reviews, Slack support.
What Costs Extra: Custom integrations beyond scope (+$2–3K each), bespoke training on proprietary data (+$2K).
Transparent issue log, weekly reviews, escalation path, credits/remediation if we fail SLA.
Issue Resolution Process:
Step 1: Immediate Flag
- You raise issue in Slack (or email)
- We acknowledge within 2 hours (Scale clients)
- Issue logged in shared tracker
Step 2: Investigation
- Assigned to specific engineer (you know who's on it)
- Root cause analysis (usually 24 hours)
- You're updated daily (or more)
Step 3: Resolution
- Fix deployed (prioritized based on severity)
- You verify it's resolved
- Retrospective (what went wrong, how we prevent it)
If We Disagree:
- Escalate to founders (both sides)
- If truly intractable → mediation or professional parting
- Credits/refund if we clearly failed
Our Philosophy: No blame, focus on solutions, speed to resolution, transparency.
Team & Credentials
15+ engineers + AI specialists. Team has experience from: startups, enterprises, Google, OpenAI, Anthropic ecosystem.
Our Team:
- Founders: Serial entrepreneurs (2+ successful exits)
- Engineers: 8 full-stack + 2 LLM specialists
- AI/ML: 3 ML engineers (agentic systems expertise)
- Product: 1 product manager (focuses on outcomes)
- Operations: 1 ops + 1 customer success
Key Credentials:
- LLM expertise: Team worked on Claude/GPT-adjacent projects
- Production systems: Experience scaling to millions of users
- Startups: 70% built products at early-stage startups
- Enterprise: 20% spent time at enterprises
- Open source: Active contributors to LangGraph, n8n
Transparency: We're not a 50-person agency pretending to be lean. We're not a 500-person consulting firm pretending to be startup-friendly. We're right-sized: Just enough to execute, lean enough to move fast.
Weekly research sessions, monthly model evaluations, active in open-source communities. You benefit from upgrades automatically.
How We Stay Current:
Weekly Research: Every Monday: Team reviews new AI research. Wednesday: Test new models/frameworks in sandbox. Friday: Evaluation → do we upgrade our stack?
Monthly Model Evals: Test Claude 3.5 vs. GPT-4 vs. Gemini on your specific workflows. Measure: speed, accuracy, cost, latency. If new model is 30%+ better → we switch automatically.
Active Open-Source: Team contributes to LangGraph, n8n, LlamaIndex, CrewAI. We know these frameworks inside-out.
Real Example: January 2025: Claude 3.5 Sonnet released. We tested it on 50 production agents. Saw 25% improvement in reasoning + 15% cost reduction. Migrated all Scale clients automatically (no downtime, no extra charge).
Not certified (AI certs are mostly marketing); instead we have: live production systems, case studies, client testimonials, and 95% retention.
Why We Don't Have Certifications: AI certifications are marketing exercises, outdated quickly, not indicative of real production skills.
What We Have Instead:
1. Live Production Systems: 50+ agents in production, serving thousands of end-users, 99%+ uptime track record.
2. Case Studies: ADW Finance (loan operations), IL Faro (property management). Both measurable outcomes, real businesses.
3. Client Testimonials: 95% retention rate, repeat clients (1 agent → 5+ agents), referrals.
4. Real Partnerships: Works with OpenAI, Anthropic (API partnerships), integrated with 100+ platforms, active in open-source communities.
Why This Matters: Certifications look good on LinkedIn. Production systems that work prove competence. We prioritize the latter.
Risk Mitigation & Business Continuity
You own all code + infrastructure. Agents keep running independently. Zero vendor lock-in.
Code Ownership:
- All agent code = yours (hire anyone to maintain it)
- All integrations = documented + yours
- All data = in your systems (not ours)
- All logs = yours to keep forever
If M AI Disappears: Your agents still run (on your cloud infrastructure), you can hire any engineer to maintain them, no dependency on us.
How We Protect You:
1. Escrow Code: Production code held in escrow. If we don't communicate for 60 days → code released to you.
2. Documentation: Complete runbooks, architecture diagrams, deployment instructions.
3. Independence Options: After Scale ends, you can run agents yourself with 2-week transition support.
Reality: We're profitable, growing, not going anywhere. But this guarantee exists anyway.
We follow SOC2 practices (encryption, access controls, audit logs). In case of breach: transparent communication + incident report + remediation plan.
Our Security Posture:
Prevention: Encryption in transit (TLS 1.3), encryption at rest (AES-256), role-based access control, VPN for on-premise, regular security audits, no credentials in code.
Detection: Real-time monitoring, automated alerts, threat intelligence, quarterly penetration testing.
Response (If Breach Occurs):
1. Immediate: Isolate affected systems (within 1 hour)
2. Day 1: Notify you directly (no silence)
3. Day 2: Incident report (what happened, when, how)
4. Day 3: Remediation plan
5. Ongoing: Monitoring to prevent recurrence
We Tell You: Honest assessment, what data was accessed, what we're doing to prevent recurrence. Transparency > hiding it.
Insurance: We carry cyber liability insurance covering breach notification and remediation costs.
Alternatives & Competitive Comparison
In-house is better for custom moat + long-term product. M AI is better for fast deployment + immediate ROI. Many companies do both.
In-House vs. M AI:
- Time to production: 3–6 months vs. 4–6 weeks
- Upfront cost: ₹50L–₹1Cr (hiring engineers) vs. ₹8–15K (pilot)
- Monthly cost: ₹1.5Cr+ (salaries) vs. ₹3–8K (Scale)
- Maintenance: You own everything vs. We own reliability
- Scaling to 5 agents: Hire more engineers vs. Same M AI team
- Competitive moat: High (custom code) vs. Low (portable agents)
When In-House Wins: You have 1–2 years to invest, want proprietary agents, have good engineering talent.
When M AI Wins: Need agents in weeks, want predictable costs, don't have AI expertise, want focus on business.
Hybrid Approach (Best): Year 1: Use M AI for first 3 agents. Year 2: Hire internal engineer to learn. Year 3: Internal maintains + builds custom.
Final Trust Builders
No blanket money-back guarantee (pilots are custom). Instead: iterate until satisfied or part ways professionally.
Why No 30-Day Money-Back Guarantee:
1. Customization: Each pilot is custom-built (can't resell)
2. Your Execution Matters: Agent quality depends on your data quality
3. Prevents Abuse: "Get free agent, then refund" (rare, but happens)
What We Offer Instead:
Pilot Satisfaction Guarantee: We iterate free (up to 2–3 cycles) until you're satisfied. Options: Refund, pivot workflow, or keep agent + pause support.
Scale Partnership Guarantee: Month-to-month (cancel anytime, 30-day notice). No lock-in = our best guarantee. We keep you because work is good.
Real Guarantee: Your success = our repeated business. 95% of pilots become Scale partnerships. 95%+ Scale clients stay.
What If Still Unsure? Start with free audit, talk to existing clients, see case studies, book a call.
Have More Questions?
All information provided is for general guidance only. See our legal disclaimer for important terms and limitations.